What is the Fed’s Labor Market Conditions Index?
Follow this link to learn more about the Labor Market Conditions Index: What is the Fed’s Labor Market Conditions Index?
Follow this link to learn more about the Labor Market Conditions Index: What is the Fed’s Labor Market Conditions Index?
Last Week
The focus of the global economy shifted entirely to Europe last week, and the continued lackluster economic numbers were among the main reasons we saw such massive volatility and selling in risk assets. At the moment, U.S. and Chinese data are firmly in the backseat (barring any major disappointments).
Specifically within Europe, focus was on Germany last week and the data simply weren’t good: Monday it was August manufacturers’ orders, which slumped —declining -5.7% vs. (E) -2.5%. Tuesday it was August industrial production, which fell -4% vs. (E) -1.1%). And then Thursday exports dropped -5.8% in August—completing a trifecta of negative data from Germany.
Now, to be fair, August is typically a bad data month in Europe, and especially the export numbers were hurt by the timing of a holiday. But at this point the No. 1 concern for the market is global growth and, specifically, whether Europe is backsliding into a recession. And as Germany goes, so goes Europe. So, the bad data elevated fears about global economy growth.
While the European data were the most important last week, the most followed/anticipated release was the FOMC minutes, which surprised markets by being exceptionally dovish. The main takeaway was the “core” of the Committee appears much more concerned about growth in Europe, global growth and the stronger dollar than most people thought. As a result, they seem to be putting a lot of weight behind these risks, implying they may be more dovish than the market thinks.
Oddly, these “dovish” minutes were somewhat contradicted by FOMC officials’ comments later in the week, as multiple Fed presidents—including former Vice Chair Dudley and current Vice Chair Fischer—implied “lift off” for interest rates remains mid-2015. That muddled message added to the volatility in stocks last week.
Muddled message aside, the market took the Fed is dovish last week, and Fed Fund futures are now pricing in a rate hike sometime in Q4 2015.
Turning to actual data in the U.S., it was sparse but what we got was good: the 4-week moving average for jobless claims fell to an 8-year low, while both the Kansas City Fed Labor Market Index and the new “Labor Market Conditions Index” both showed further improvement in the jobs market (some tried to spin the LMCI as dovish, but it wasn’t).
Finally, Chinese composite PMI slightly missed expectations but remained solidly above 50, and the market largely ignored the release.
Bottom line is the main concern of the market is the health of the global economy, and last week’s data were not reassuring.
This Week
It’s going to be a busy week, as there are multiple reports from all regions of the globe (U.S., Europe and Asia), although as mentioned, the European data will be the most important.
Starting with that, then, we get multiple readings on inflation and growth from Europe.
First, the growth numbers to watch (in order of importance): EMU industrial production comes Thursday (it’s going to be bad—just a question of how bad). The German ZEW Business Survey is released Tuesday night (look at the expectations component), while Italian GDP is released Wednesday (there are fears that Italy is already in a recession).
Turning to inflation, we get final inflation readings for September (we got the “flash” readings two weeks ago). There shouldn’t be any major surprises, but given the concern about deflation, if the flashes are revised down even by just -0.1%, look for that to pressure the market.
Italian CPI comes Tuesday, Germany CPI is released Wednesday, EMU HICP comes Thursday, and French CPI comes Friday.
Again, this is all about Europe at the moment, so any good news on the growth or inflation front will be welcomed by risk assets.
Turning to the U.S., it’s also a busy week. By all accounts, U.S. growth remains “fine,” but this market is unsettled and it needs a confidence boost. Good data this week, especially from Empire State manufacturing and the Philly Fed (Wed/Thurs), could help sentiment. That’s because they are the first look at October data and will remind everyone growth here is still good.
Also on the calendar are retail sales (Wednesday) and industrial production (Thursday), as well as weekly claims and housing starts (Friday). Again, while none of these numbers will change anyone’s outlook on growth for the U.S., they will affect confidence, so good numbers are needed.
Finally turning to China, its trade balance was better than expected, while CPI and PPI are tomorrow. Again, not to be repetitive, but the No. 1 concern is about global growth—if the trade numbers are a disappointment, that’s going to be a headwind.
To continue reading today’s Sevens Report, simply sign up for a free trial on the right hand side of this page.
What Happened to JNK?
Perhaps the most unnerving thing I saw yesterday was the big drop in JNK and rally in EUM. Given what the Fed did Wednesday, that is the exact opposite of what should have happened. And, this tells me yesterday’s sell-off was a lot more about escalating concerns about Europe and growth than dis-inflation.
To continue reading this analysis and find out whether it is time to get defensive on stocks or not, simply sign up for a free trial on the right hand side of this page.
FOMC Minutes
The minutes were obviously dovish, given the stock market surge, dollar decline and bond rally. They were taken as dovish for three primary reasons:
Given the minutes, it was no surprise then that “Considerable Time” and “Significant Underutilization” stayed in the September statement – and it’s clear from the minutes that the FOMC is still much more concerned about the various risks to the recovery. And this is totally trumping any urgency to begin to normalize policy.
The bottom line here is that is would appear the majority of the FOMC is more dovish than we previously believed, and their confidence in the economy remains low. This was a dovish event, and while it doesn’t necessarily mean we’re going to see expectations for the first rate hike pushed out from June 2015, it’s certainly a step in that direction.
From an investment takeaway standpoint, although I don’t think we’re going to see stocks immediately move to new highs, I think we will see money move back into more risky/higher yielding instruments, so as a result if you own SJB I would take at least some profits, and I’m closing out our EUM hedge this morning, as the Fed’s dovish will send money back into lower quality, higher yielding assets in the near term.
Sign up for a Two Week Free Trial on the right hand side of this page to read our most recent analysis.
Tom Essaye discusses the outlook for Europe on CNBC’s Closing Bell.
Labor Market Conditions Index
Takeaway
There was a lot of talk about this number last week, as it is a new publicly published, comprehensive labor market index the Fed used to use internally (it’s been around since the 1970s). It’s comprised of 19 different labor market indicators (all of which are public). Basically, this is the Fed’s employment indicator “dashboard” and as such it’s something we all need to follow.
Much was made last week about the fact that the index rose just 2.5 points compared to an average of 4.9 points each month for the first 6 months of 2014. As a result this was construed as “dovish” and was partly responsible for the big sell-off we saw in the Dollar Index.
It’s odd, then, that virtually every major job indicator in September was good, yet the LMCI was “soft.” And, that likely had to do with the fact that the LMCI probably puts a lot of weight on hours worked, changes in the participation rate, or wages themselves (all of which were subdued in the jobs report Friday).
Given the release contains just the monthly change and not an absolute level, it’s hard to get too much of a gauge on how important this report really is from a Fed standpoint, and frankly I’m thinking not that important. For instance, the absolute level of this index could be at multi-year highs, and as such the incremental monthly 2.5-point disappointment really isn’t that big a deal (because the absolute level is good). Point being, a 2.5 point increase if the absolute level were at 100 (which could be a 6 year high) is a lot less disappointing than a 2.5 point gain when the absolute level is at 40 (a multi-year low). I’m guessing it’s more towards the later.
Regardless, while it was taken as “dovish” yesterday and helped the dollar to sell off and bonds to rally, I don’t think it negates the strong September jobs report and really isn’t that dovish in a fundamental sense (and definitely won’t change any Fed policy decisions).
But, it’s a new monthly number we all need to watch—so going forward we’ll be keeping an eye on it.
Last Week
The were multiple and varied important economic data points released last week, but the general takeaway is this: While the global economic recovery is clearly losing steam, data in the U.S. consistently show the recovery is not only solid but also gaining momentum. This dichotomy between the direction of the U.S. economy and other major global economies (Japan, Europe and China) is accelerating and will continue to have implications across asset classes (and it’s the main reason the greenback continues to surge).
Looking then to the specific data from last week, focus was on last Friday’s jobs report (which was almost perfectly “Goldilocks”), but the most important numbers last week were the global September PMIs.
By now you know they were universally disappointing, led by a surprise drop in the German reading to 49.9. The broader EMU number wasn’t much better and is teetering above 50 (50.3, to be exact), while the official government number from China also barely stayed above 50. Even the U.S. PMI missed at 56.6, but on an absolute basis that’s still pretty strong, so it isn’t really that much of a negative.
Bottom line with the September PMIs (ex-U.S.) was that they were weak. They imply the EU economy is further decelerating and that it’s inching closer to a triple-dip recession. Meanwhile both Japan and China are seeing the rate of growth slow—raising fears of a potential “hard landing,” although that’s a bit premature. Regardless, though, the data last week demonstrated that global growth is diminishing, and that’s a risk for global stock prices if it continues.
Staying global for a moment, the second most important thing that happened last week was the ECB meeting, which was initially taken as “disappointing” mainly because ECB President Mario Draghi didn’t further (and more forcefully) allude to “QE.” Also, Bloomberg reported over the weekend there were three dissents to the measures announced—so while they were passed, that’s not going to help alleviate concerns the ECB isn’t truly committed to doing what’s necessary in Europe (i.e., QE).
But, to focus for a moment on what the plans they actually implemented (which is more important than the soft analysis), the ECB did include “retained” covered bonds in its “private market” QE program, which begins later this month.
This means the “private market” QE program, which is the ECB buying Asset-Backed Securities and covered bonds, is going to be bigger than initially thought. That’s important because size matters here — the bigger the private-market QE program, the larger the expansion of the ECB balance sheet. And, the larger the balance sheet expansion, the more help should be provided to the economy … and the greater the upward pressure on Europe. So, although the reaction was one of disappointment, the news from the ECB was bullish for European stocks beyond the very near term.
Finally, turning to the jobs report, it was almost perfectly “Goldilocks.” The headline number was a strong beat (248K) and we also encouragingly saw positive revisions to August (from 142K to 180K). So, clearly this number reflects that the jobs market continues to improve. But, what made the number “Goldilocks” was the fact that year-over-year wages increased only 2.0%, which implies the pop in wage inflation we saw earlier this year hasn’t stuck. As such, the jobs number won’t result in more pressure on the Fed (because the jobs gains are resulting in wage inflation). Also, the unemployment rate fell to 5.9% but that’s because of the participation rate—not substantial job gains.
So, bottom line is the jobs number was a good report and came at the right time (we needed a reminder that the U.S. recovery is doing fine). But there is enough weakness in the details that this report (wages and the participation rate) that it’s not going to cause the Fed to become incrementally more “hawkish.”
This Week
It’s a very quiet week, economically speaking. The most important event this week will be the minutes release from the September FOMC meeting (Wednesday). As usual, the market is going to be looking for any clues as to just how “hawkish” the discussion about policy was at the meeting. In particular, any sort of commentary on the anticipated pace of interest rate increases will be especially important (remember the “dot” projection for ’15, ’16 and ’17 all increased at this meeting). So, it’ll be important for stocks that the minutes reflect a “not too hawkish” Fed.
Outside of the FOMC minutes it’s very quiet domestically, as weekly claims is the only other notable number. Internationally, composite Chinese PMIs are the highlight (Tuesday), while we also get a Bank of England meeting Thursday (there will be no change to policy) and some sporadic second-tier international economic data. But, nothing released this week should materially alter the economic outlook for Europe, China or Japan, even if there are positive/negative surprises.
To continue reading this analysis and explore the rest of today’s edition of the Sevens Report, simply sign up for a zero-risk, two week free trial on the right hand side of this page.
Is Dis-Inflation a Worry?
Since the surprisingly weak CPI report earlier in September, there’s been a subtle but growing concern about the return of dis-inflation—not in the EU, but in the U.S. And, recently we’ve seen a fair bit of financial media coverage detailing the fall in market inflation expectations—so I wanted to cover the topic and explain why we’re seeing that dip (it’s not entirely because the market is expecting dis-inflation).
Renewed worries about dis-inflation have come from three places:
First, commodity prices have utterly collapsed since earlier this summer, which obviously weighs on inflation statistics.
Second, despite the stock market reacting “dovishly” to the last Fed meeting, bonds and the dollar are beginning to price in the reality of a rising Fed Funds rate in mid-2015. Given the apparent lack of statistical inflation, the reality of a higher Fed Funds rate will dampen expectations for inflation 5 years out.
Third, and most-cited, both the 5- and 10-year Breakeven Inflation Rate have dropped precipitously over the past three months. (The breakeven inflation rate is the difference between the yield on a Treasury bill vs. the yield on the same-duration TIP. So, the 5 year-inflation break-even is the yield on the 5-year Treasury minus the yield on the 5-year TIP.)
These events have led some to become worried that the U.S. is about to go through another period of “dis-inflation.” If that does indeed happen, then stock prices will get hit—potentially hard (because the Fed is basically out of monetary bullets). It’s also led some to believe the Fed may end up being slightly more “dovish” than is currently expected.
But, yesterday we got some encouraging news on inflation. The August “Core PCE Price Index,” which is the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, was unchanged from July, at a +1.5% increase year-over-year. Importantly, it didn’t confirm the drop we saw in CPI in August, and should help to alleviate some concerns about dis-inflation (this was underappreciated by the market yesterday).
Turning then to the “inflation breakeven,” with regard to the drop in the 5-year inflation breakeven, that number is very highly correlated to commodity prices. If you’ll look at a chart of the 5-year breakeven yield (link here), it started to decline very shortly after commodity prices began to collapse in late June. So, it would appear most of that has to do with commodity price declines (so it’s mostly a commodity phenomenon, not something more structural and worrisome).
The 10-year breakeven is a bit more worrisome, but if you look at that chart, what you’ll see is it really came for sale hard following the lackluster jobs report of August. What I think the 10-year is reflecting is the lack of wage inflation, as represented by the poor August jobs report. Remember, wage inflation begets real inflation, so until we start to see material wage inflation (which will come from further labor market improvement), expect the 10-year inflation expectations to remain relatively subdued.
Bottom line, dis-inflation is a background risk we need to monitor here in the U.S.—but at this point the low inflation readings seem to be more a product of commodity price declines and sluggish wage inflation … not an indicator that the market’s fundamental outlook on inflation going forward has materially changed.
This was an excerpt from a recent edition of the Sevens Report, the only daily publication that provides you with everything you need to know about the markets, by 7:00 AM each morning, in 7 minutes or less. To try the Sevens Report free for two weeks, simply sign up on the right hand side of this page.
The Key to Europe—the ECB Balance Sheet (What It Means for Stocks and Bonds)
What Happened: Part of the reason we’ve seen a rally over the past two days in the Treasury market is because of Europe—specifically the “dud” of the first TLTROs late last week.
Not only was demand for the initial offering poor (86.4 billion vs. (E) 150 billion euros), but on Friday European banks actually repaid nearly 19 billion euros worth of the previous LTRO, making the total addition to the ECB balance sheet only about 67 billion (86.4B – 19B)—less than half of the 150 billion the market expected.
Why It’s Important: The size of the ECB balance sheet is very critical to the economic recovery in Europe. QE, TLTROs, ABS purchases and all the other acronyms are simply tools being deployed to accomplish the same goal—to get the ECB balance sheet to rise.
The logic goes that if the ECB can expand its balance sheet and pump money into the system, then they should create economic growth. That would in turn create inflation, which would then solve the deflation problem they are currently experiencing. (That script has “worked” in the US, UK and lately, Japan).
So, to keep things simple, an expanding balance sheet is inflationary and positive for growth, while a contracting balance sheet is deflationary. And as you can see from the chart, the ECB is the only major central bank whose balance sheet has been contracting.
How We Make Money Off It: If the ECB fails to materially expand its balance sheet, then deflation will get a tighter grip on the economy. European bonds will rally like they did for most of this year, and that will put upward pressure on Treasuries—just like it did from March to September.
As the ECB implements these measures (TLTRO, ABS), you will see the market waver in the short term between thinking the measures are working (and the balance sheet expanding, which is Treasury-bearish) and the measures failing (as in the case of last week, which is Treasury-bullish).
Treasuries will be much more sensitive to the short-term data from Europe than stocks. But importantly, as long as the ECB remains committed to expanding the balance sheet, any short-term rally is “noise” compared to the overall negative trend in bonds.
European stocks should be much less sensitive to short-term fluctuations than bonds. That’s because, as was the case last week, the failure of the initial TLTRO was just seen as further increasing the odds of QE. The ECB simply cannot fail to increase its balance sheet and spur a recovery—because if they do, it’s very likely the EU would split apart. (Southern European countries are not going to stay in the EU if deflation takes hold—they will break away and devalue their own currencies.)
So, bottom line is this:
“Short bond positions” will see volatility depending on what’s happening with the ECB balance sheet, because it will directly affect Treasuries. But, the trend should remain lower in bonds as long as the ECB remains committed to balance sheet expansion. So, don’t get spooked by counter-trend rallies.
For “long Europe” equity positions, the trend upward should be more smooth, as stocks are clearly viewing “bad as good” in Europe—as long as the expectation remains that the ECB will eventually do QE. Point being, the trends (Treasuries down, European stocks up) remains in place despite the fact we’re likely to see some short term counter trend moves.
To learn more, sign up for a two week free trial on the right hand side of this page.
4880 Donald Ross Rd., Suite 210
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418
info@sevensreport.com
(561) 408-0918