Posts

EIA Report Analysis and Oil Update, September 8, 2017

Get the simple talking points you need to strengthen your client relationships with a free trial two-week trial of The Sevens Report.

Yesterday’s EIA report was taken with a grain of salt, as the effects of Hurricane Harvey badly skewed the data resulting in a print that was basically worthless from a fundamental analysis standpoint. As would be expected with a large number of refinery outages, crude stocks rose +4.6M bbls, but that was slightly less than estimates calling for a +5.0M build.

EIA Report Analysis and Oil Update

Meanwhile, both gasoline and heating oil inventories declined (as refineries runs were way down) by -3.2M bbls and -1.4M bbls, respectively (but both declines were smaller than expected). On balance, the headline prints were largely dismissed. WTI finished the day down 0.22% while RBOB gasoline futures fell 0.98%.

The production portion of the report was a little shocking at first glance, but at the same time, the data made sense when you consider the impact Harvey had on the Gulf Coast oil industry. Lower 48 production declined -783K b/d last week, or 94% of the 2017 output gains.

For perspective, the average weekly change coming into this week was +24K b/d. Like the headlines, the production data was largely overlooked by traders because the data was so badly skewed by Hurricane Harvey.

Looking ahead, it will be very important to watch the production data. If output does not recover in a swift manner that will be a bullish supply side development, as the relentless grind higher in US oil output has been the single-largest headwind for oil prices this year. For now, the outlook for oil is neutral with a bias to the downside, as nothing has changed materially enough to push futures through resistance between $50 and $54/barrel in WTI.

Skip the jargon, arcane details and drab statistics from in-house research, and get the simple analysis that will improve your performance. Get your free two-week trial of the Sevens Report today.

Oil Market Internals Confirm Our View of “Lower-for-Longer” Price Environment, February 24, 2017

This is an excerpt from today’s Sevens Report. Sign up for your free two-week trial to get everything you need to know in your inbox, by 7am in 7 minutes or less.

We have recently been monitoring the calendar spreads and term structure of WTI crude oil futures with a little more attention, as there have been notable developments.

As a refresher, a calendar spread is simply the difference in price between two contracts with different expirations. For example, contracts with a December ’17 expiration are currently trading at a roughly $1.00/bbl premium to contracts expiring in December ’18 (this is called an inverted market, or backwardation, and is not typical in energy markets). Normally, back-month con-tracts are more expensive than front-month contracts to reflect the price of storage and other variables. Such a structure is called normal contango.

The trend is long-term bearish oil.

The trend is long-term bearish oil.

Over the last week or two, calendar spreads have surged, which would be considered very bullish in normal market conditions like we had late last year when OPEC announced their agreement to cut production with several large NOPEC producers. After that announcement, the entire WTI expiration curve rallied on the speculation of that bullish development in the supply-demand fundamentals with front-month contracts out-performing back months (calendar spreads rallied, con-firming the move in active-month futures).

In the current case, the strength in the calendar spreads has been the result of weakness in back-month contracts like December ’18. Think about the simple equation a – b = c (calendar spread). If “a” (Dec ’17) and “b” (Dec ’18) are both increasing, but the pace of a’s increase is faster, “c” will be positive (so the calendar spreads would be rallying, which is bullish). Right now, “c” is rising because of a faster decline in “b” than in “a” and that is far less of a reason to be optimistic on this current, sluggish trend higher in oil prices.

Stepping back, this development in the calendar spreads confirms what we have been saying, and that is we remain in a lower-for-longer price environment in the energy market.

The logical reason for a faster decline in back-month contracts such as December ’18 expiration suggests that US producers are hedging out future production for wells they have either just brought online or are in the process of bringing online. And this concept supports our idea that US production has not only bottomed, but has begun a cyclical move higher.

Bottom line, that trend is long-term bearish oil for two reasons. First, the obvious fact that rising US output will offset the efforts of the production cut agreement overseas is supply side bearish. Second, OPEC producers are not likely going to be comfortable with the idea of losing market share to the US again (after all, that is the reason they switched to “full-throttle” policy back in summer 2014, which led to the near-80% plunge in oil prices over the subsequent 18 months). The more market share OPEC loses to the US the more likely their compliance to individual quotas will begin to fall, which is very bearish for prices as that is what this current recovery into the $50s is fundamentally based on.

Looking ahead, we could very well see a continued run higher towards our initial target of $57.50, or to our secondary target of $60/bbl, as optimism surrounding OPEC compliance remains elevated. The longer-term outlook is not so bright, and the low $50s will likely remain a “magnetic” level for WTI futures.

The Sevens Report is the daily market cheat sheet our subscribers use to keep up on markets, seize opportunities, avoid risks and get more assets. Sign up for a free 2-week trial today.

Economics: This Week and Last Week. February 21, 2017

An excerpt from today’s Sevens Report. Subscribe now to get the full report in your inbox before 7am each morning.

Both economic growth and inflation accelerated according to last week’s data, and while the former continues to help support stocks despite a darkening outlook from Washington, the latter also is increasing the likelihood of a more hawkish-than-expected Fed in 2017, and a resumption of the uptrend in interest rates. For now, though, the benefit of the former is outweighing the risk of the latter.

If, however, we do not see any dip in the data between now and early May, I do expect the Fed to hike rates at that May meeting, which would be a marginal hawkish surprise. To boot, if we get a strong Jobs report (out Friday, March 3), then a March rate hike two weeks later isn’t out of the question. Point being, upward pressure is building on interest rates again.

Last Week

Both economic growth and inflation accelerated according to last week’s data.

Looking at last week’s data, it was almost universally strong. Retail Sales, which was the key number last week, handily beat expectations as the headline rose 0.4% vs. (E) 0.1% while the more important “Control” retail sales (which is the best measure of discretionary consumer spending) rose 0.4% vs. (E) 0.3%. Additionally, there were positive revisions to the December data, and clearly the US consumer continues to spend (which is more directly positive for the credit card companies).

Additionally, the first look at February manufacturing data was very strong. Empire Manufacturing beat estimates, rising to 18.7 vs. (E) 7.5, a 2-1/2 year high. However, it was outdone by Philly Fed, which surged to 43.3 vs. (E) 19.3, the highest reading since 1983! Both regional manufacturing surveys are volatile, but clearly they show an uptick in activity, which everyone now expects to be reflected in the national flash PMI.

Even housing data was decent as Housing Starts beat estimates on the headline, while the more important single family starts (the better gauge of the residential real estate market) rose 1.9%. Single family permits, a leading indicator for single family starts, did dip by 2.7%, but even so the important takeaway from this data is that so far, higher interest rates don’t appear to be negatively impacting the residential housing market, and a stable housing market is a key, but underappreciated, ingredient to economic acceleration.

Finally, looking at the Fed, Yellen’s commentary was marginally hawkish, as she was upbeat on the economy, basically saying the nation had achieved full employment and was closing on 2% inflation, and reiterated that a rate hike should be considered at upcoming meetings. None of her comments were new, but the reiteration of them reminds us that the Fed is in a hiking cycle, and the risk is for more hikes… not less.

This Week

The big number this week is the February global flash manufacturing PMI, out Tuesday. With last week’s strong Empire and Philly Surveys, expectations will be pretty elevated for the flash manufacturing PMI, so there is some risk of mild disappointment. On the flip side, if this number is very strong (like Empire and Philly) you will likely see a hawkish reaction out of the markets (dollar/bond yields up) and the expectation for a rate hike before June increases. That, by itself, shouldn’t cause a pullback in stocks, but upward pressure will build on interest rates.

Outside of the flash manufacturing PMIs, the FOMC minutes from the January meeting will be released Wednesday, and investors will parse the comments for any clues as to the likelihood of a March increase. Yet given the amount of political/fiscal uncertainty, and considering the FOMC meeting was before the strong January jobs report and recent acceleration in data, I’d be surprised if the minutes are very hawkish (although given they are dated, I don’t think that not-dovish minutes reduces the chances of a May or even March hike).

Bottom line, the focus will be on the flash manufacturing PMIs, and a good number this week will be supportive for stocks.

Join hundreds of advisors from huge brokerage firms like Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo Advisors, Raymond James and more… see if the Sevens Report is right for you.

Chart of the Day: Putin Pushes Crude Futures to 1-Year High

cl-10-10-16

The global benchmark, Brent crude oil futures rallied to a one year high yesterday on the back of bullish comments from Russian President Vladimir Putin as the speculative, “production-cap rally” continues.

 

The Market’s Bell with WSJ Best-Selling Author Simon Constable

WSJ best-selling author Simon Constable puts a little British spin on the US economy where to invest now. He’s fun, brutally honest and wicked smart.

Chart of the Day: Oil Breaks Out on Bullish OPEC Developments

cl-9-28-16

Crude oil rallied as much as 6% yesterday, materially breaking through a 6 week old downtrend line after OPEC officials “came to an understanding” about enacting a production ceiling at their meeting in November.

 

Chart of the Day: Natural Gas Breakout

ng-9-20-16

After breaking out from a multi-year downtrend earlier this year, natural gas futures are beginning to show signs of life. And while the long-term outlook is dependent on weather, near-term momentum could quickly carry futures up towards our initial target of $3.50.

 

Chart of the Day: WTI Crude Oil Futures Trade Heavy

cl-9-19-16

WTI crude oil futures continue to trade heavy following last week’s breakdown through a 7-week-old supporting uptrend line. There is initial support at $43.50/barrel however a violation could see futures fall swiftly towards the $40/barrel mark.

 

Chart of the Day: Technical Tipping Point in Oil

cl-9-7-16

WTI crude oil futures approached a technical tipping point yesterday as they rallied into a near-term, downtrend resistance level. Where futures close today will be important for the near-term direction of energy prices

 

Tom Essaye Featured in Forbes.com – Stocks Struggling To Break Free Of Oil’s Slide

By Steve Schaefer at Forbes.com

It’s oil’s market, stocks are just living in it.

That’s the most common takeaway from the first few trading days of 2015, as the months-long punishing of oil prices and energy stocks keeps broader market averages mired in negative territory.

If oil, junk bonds and the ruble are rolling over, expect equities to fall in concert, according to Tom Essaye, author of the Sevens Report. When that trio is pushing toward fresh lows, “the stock market will go down in sympathy.”

Tuesday the trend continued, with a short-lived morning rally in stocks evarporating as oil prices slumped further below the $50 mark. West Texas crude dropped more than 4% to below $48 a barrel, while Brent slumped 4.5% to $50.71. The S&P 500 fell 1%, with energy its worst-performing sector by a wide margin.

FactSet senior earnings analyst John Butters points out that analysts still seem optimistic on the sector — energy is tied with healthcare for the highest percentage of buy ratings in any sector (57%) and companies like SchlumbergerSLB -0.04%, Kinder Morgan KMI -0.6%, Phillips 66 PSX -1.25%, EOG Resources EOG +1.16%and Williams Companies boast buy rankings from more than 80% of Street analysts who cover them — even though earnings are expected to fall more than 19% in 2015.

Citigroup’s Tobias Levkovich points to the chart below, which shows that while 2015 earnings expectations have plunged in the energy sector, 2016 have been little changed.

energy chart

Perhaps that’s because analysts think the selloff is overdone and has created some undervalued opportunities. More likely it’s because the damage in the energy sector has come so rapidly the analysts haven’t even had a chance yet to turn their attention to future years.

At some level, bargain-seekers will think oil and energy stocks are worth buying, but Essaye warns that the true oil shakeout some are waiting for may be a bit further off than they think.

A global supply glut barreling up against weakening economic growth is a well-understood factor in oil’s slide, but another element Essaye points to is the potential breathing room oil companies have thanks to hedging strategies.

Companies that hedged their 2015 production at prices around $90 or more per barrel can likely stay afloat longer than outsiders like OPEC anticipated, given that those hedges are now “in the money in a big way,” according to Essaye. Net short positions held by producers have leaped from 15 million contracts in August to 77 million last week.

“Bottom line, shale producers are not yet feeling the “full on” pain from the roughly 50% selloff thanks to their hedging strategies,” Essaye says. “Sso we can expect production to remain high and fundamentals to remain very bearish.” He expects oil to head toward $45 a barrel in the near term.

In a recent letter to clients, Forest Value Fund’s Thomas Forester notes that the sliding prices in oil have been considerably worse than the broader declines in other industrial commodities, which might be explained away in part by the end of the Federal Reserve’s monthly asset purchases – which provided cheap money that sloshed into emerging economies like China’s – and the strengthening dollar.

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschaefer/2015/01/06/stocks-struggling-to-break-free-of-oils-slide/