Geopolitical Update: Russia and Ukraine

After a few months of calm, the situation in Ukraine is heating up. Russian tanks were reportedly crossing the border Friday and intense fighting between Russian separatists in Ukraine and government forces was reported over the weekend.

As has been the case, the truly negative event here is a full-on, blatant Russian invasion of Ukraine, but that appears unlikely still. In truth, the ruble has very quietly been crashing in the forex markets, and this move may be nothing more than a political ploy by Putin to re-direct focus to Russian military might.

Regardless, an escalation of violence could be a slight headwind on stocks but nothing major, at this point. Energy, however, will be a big winner from even a slight uptick in tensions, as there is little geopolitical risk premium in the energy complex right now. If you like high risk/reward setups, energy is the way to play this right now (via XLE or XOP/FCG).

This was an excerpt from the equities section of today’s Sevens Report. To continue reading today’s report simply sign up for a free trial on the right hand side of this page.

Sevens Report 11.10.14

Sevens Report 11.10.14VQD

BLS Jobs Report Preview

Jobs Report Preview

The importance of these jobs reports from a Fed policy standpoint is on the rise, and the risk to stocks is for the numbers to run too “hot” and pull forward Fed interest rate increases.

The “Too Hot” Scenario: >300K job gains. A jobs number this strong would likely result in a pulling forward of rate increase expectations, and the markets would react hawkishly: Stocks, bonds and commodities would all decline, the U.S. dollar would continue to rally.

The “Just Right” Scenario: 180K – 290K job gains. This is the “sweet spot” for this report, as it implies a still-healing labor market but not one that’s so strong it would pull forward the date of the first rate hike. A number in this range shouldn’t elicit too much of a market reaction as it’s mostly priced in.

The “Too Cold” Scenario: <180k job gains. Given all the other employment metrics released in October, the chances of this number being a big miss are very remote.

If we get a number below 180K, expect a mildly “dovish” reaction—stocks and the dollar will decline, while bonds and commodities will rally. But, even if this is a big miss, don’t expect markets to move too much as it’ll probably be discounted as a statistical aberration.

Wage Increases and the Unemployment Rate: >2.2% and <5.9% will be taken as “hawkish.”

Given the risk is skewed to the “hawkish” side of things for this meeting, changes in the year-over-year wage gains and unemployment rate are equally as important as the headline jobs number.

An annual wage increase over 2.2% would be considered “hawkish” and elicit a “hawkish” reaction from markets, while a drop in the unemployment rate below 5.9% would also be “hawkish.”

 To read more of today’s Sevens Report simply sign up for a free trial on the right hand side of this page.

Sevens Report 11.7.14

Sevens Report 11.7.14WFW

Midterm Election Takeaways

Midterm Election Takeaways

Ignoring the politics (I’ll leave that to others far more intelligent than I), there are a few potential market takeaways to monitor now that the Republicans will control the 114th Congress (undoubtedly some clients will call asking what the mid-terms mean for the market, and I want to provide some talking points).

First, all the major players meet tomorrow at the White House (Obama, McConnell, Reid, Boehner, Pelosi), but nothing is expected to come out of the meeting other than lip service. AS far as evidence the government may start actually functioning again now that the elections are over, the first major hurdle to watch is immigration. If President Obama uses an executive order to provide amnesty to illegal immigrants and go around Congress, then it’s likely the next two years will be as contentious and useless as the previous two from Washington.

And, while that won’t necessarily cause a market decline, the market would like to see some positive action on corporate tax reform, the Keystone Pipeline and a rollback of some parts of the “Affordable Care Act.” If Obama unilaterally moves on immigration, the chances of any of the above going forward will be materially reduced. Again, it won’t be a market headwind per se. But fixing the corporate tax, approving Keystone, removing the ban on oil exports and changing the ACA would be a positive for the market.

Outside of those policy issues, we also need to consider the impact of a Republican Congress on the Fed. Rand Paul already has legislation to audit the Fed in Congress, and there have been specific requests made by Republicans for a detailed plan on how the Fed plans to normalize interest rates. Bottom line, scrutiny of the Fed could increase materially under a Republican Congress, which could make the process of normalizing policy more difficult.

Bottom line, Washington remains on the back burner from a market standpoint and will remain so until the beginning of next year when the new Congress is seated, barring an executive order from Obama on immigration. But, I think it’s safe to say that this relative quiet we’ve seen from Washington throughout 2014 won’t be repeated in 2015. If the anticipated levels of foolishness from Washington were a chart, it just bottomed.

 To read today’s edition of the Sevens Report, simply sign up for a free trial on the right hand side of this page

ISM Non-Manufacturing PMI Slightly Misses Expectations

ISM Non-Manufacturing  PMI

  • October ISM Non-Manufacturing PMI was 57.1 vs. (E) 58.0.

Takeaway

The non-manufacturing (or service sector) October PMI was a slight disappointment as it declined from a 58.6 reading in September, and the details were also a bit underwhelming. New orders (the leading indicator of the report) fell 1.9 points to 59.1, the lowest reading since April. And, this weakness was confirmed by the private firm Markit’s service sector PMI, which also fell to 57.1. The one bright spot was the employment component, which rose to 59.6 from 58.5 in September, a multi-month high (which bodes well for the jobs number Friday).

But, while a slight moderation, the bottom line here is the absolute level of activity of the service sector (which is by far the larger portion of the economy compared to manufacturing) remains strong and comfortably above 50. There is some slight evidence that, on the margin, the pace of activity in the U.S. economy is moderating slightly, but the recovery remains very much intact, and the economy remains generally supportive of stock prices.

 

Sevens Report 11.6.14

Sevens Report 11.6.14WED

Sevens Report 11.5.14

Sevens Report 11.5.14SID

What the Employment Cost Index Suggests About Inflation Rates

ECI 11.4.14

Boring But Important: Employment Cost Index

Part of our job is to watch indicators that are important and often overlooked by financial media and other research sites.

To that end, an overlooked but important number came Friday via the Employment Cost Index (ECI), a quarterly reading of employment costs and wage trends. The ECI rose +0.7% in Q3 vs. (E) +0.5%, and is up +2.2% year-over-year. Specifically the wages and salary component rose +0.8% q/q, the largest quarterly gain since ‘08.

A similar jump in wages and employment costs caught the market off-guard in July and led to a temporary spike higher in yields. That didn’t happen Friday because, as we’ve noted here, Treasuries remain more focused on international markets than domestic economics in the short term. But, it is important to note that for the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2014, the annualized increase of employment costs was +2.8%, the highest since 2008.

This is important from a Fed standpoint because it means the Fed is closer to achieving its goal of repairing the labor market. Stagnant wages, despite improvement in the unemployment rate, have been a thorn in the Fed’s side for years (it’s the “underutilization” the Fed keeps referencing).

If that trend is ending (and the ECI implies it is) then that is potentially “hawkish” down the road, because it means the Fed won’t have to keep rates this low to support the labor market that much longer.

Additionally, while all the world seems consumed by commodity-price-driven “dis-inflation,” wage inflation begets real inflation, and this number further refutes the “dis-inflation” argument. Point being, an uptick in wages is dis-inflation, regardless of what commodities are doing.

The “need to know” on this is that while it’s certainly not going to make the Fed more “hawkish” from a policy standpoint in the near term, wage inflation is bottoming. In the coming quarters (meaning into early ‘15), if wage inflation continues to increase, that may make the Fed get more hawkish than current expectations. This is an indicator we need to watch carefully in early ‘15, as the potential for a hawkish surprise from ECI is rising.

To learn more, sign up for a Free Trial on the right hand side of this page.