Archive for month: September, 2014
How I Know Scotland Isn’t Leaving the UK
/in Investing/by Customer ServiceScotland: The Only Poll We Need to Watch
There are all sorts of conflicting polls regarding whether the Scots will vote “yes” for independence or “no.” But, I’ve learned over the years that the best way to get a gauge on these types of geo-political events is to follow the money. InTrade used to be the preferred prediction market to watch, but that got shut down, so now I watch Paddy Power, Irish book makers who make odds on just about anything.
To that end, I went on PaddyPower.com yesterday to check the odds. “Against Independence” was the prohibitive favorite, at 2/7 (so wager 7 to get 2). “For Independence” was a distant 11/4 (wager 4 to get 11). Point being, according to the “market,” Scotland isn’t going anywhere.
The Fed’s Perception Problem (and why it’s Hawkish)
/in Investing/by Customer ServiceThe Fed’s Perception Problem (and why it’s Hawkish)
If the FOMC does indeed become incrementally more “hawkish” today, it’ll likely be because of the growing fear among Fed officials that the market views the Fed as simply being too “dovish.”
We’ve heard several Fed presidents reference this, and last week there was a San Francisco Fed paper citing this potential problem.
And, the worry that the market doesn’t “believe” the Fed isn’t some general “feeling” – it’s actually backed up by hard data.
Fed Funds futures, which trade on the CME and can be accessed via this link, reflect the market consensus of where the Fed Funds rate will be at the end of each month. And, simply put, the market is reflecting a much more dovish Fed than what FOMC members are stating.
The Fed Funds futures prices shows a much slower and more gradual increase in interest rates than the official Fed projections – plain and simple. And, frankly, this type of discrepancy is significant.
And, it’s a problem for the Fed.
If the Fed isn’t being taken seriously (as a hawk) then that poses a potentially serious problem. While the Fed wants to start to restrain the risk-taking and the unbridled “chase for yield” it’s manufactured over the past several years, if the market doesn’t believe the Fed will actually raise rates, then the excessive risk-taking will continue—potentially resulting in bubbles.
Point being – there is some room here for the Fed to give the markets a bit of a “hawkish” dose of reality today – if not via the removal of “considerable time,” then via other means, including the “dots” as we described yesterday, or via Yellen’s press conference.
Point being, the propensity for the Fed to give us a “hawkish” surprise is rising. While that won’t guarantee the bond declines will continue in the near term, the simple fact is that the setup is for the Fed to, finally, be slightly more hawkish. That is, until the market, as reflected by Fed Fund futures, starts to believe rates will rise sooner than is currently the consensus.
Finally, I’ve mentioned frequently that the pace of the increase in rates is more important than the date rates start to rise. You can monitor both via Fed Fund futures (or you can just let us do it … we’re watching it either way). The way it works is you subtract Fed Fund futures from 100 to get the implied Fed Funds rate. So, right now the market anticipates the first rate increase to occur in June 2015 – and if that changes tomorrow, one way or the other, Fed Funds futures will let us know.
Why the Market Thinks the Fed Is Going to Be “Hawkish”
/in Investing/by Customer ServiceWhy The Market Thinks the Fed Is Going to Be “Hawkish”
The No. 1 reason the market has priced more hawkishness into this statement is because it’s expected that the final paragraph in the statement will be altered, and the term “considerable time” will be removed from the following paragraph.
“To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens.” (Emphasis added).
That’s potentially important because “considerable time” is generally thought to mean six months.
So a translation of the above statement would read:
“…the Committee today reaffirmed its view rates will stay at 0% for six months after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens.”
And, six months from October (when QE is expected to end) is March – not June, which is the current consensus for when rate hikes will commence. So, the bottom line here is there’s a fear the Fed may be telegraphing an earlier-than-expected rate increase.
But, that’s not all we need to watch for.
I’ve been saying for over a month now that the pace of interest rate increases is actually much more important than when the first 25-basis-point increase actually occurs. If the market perceives the Fed as wanting to raise rates faster than current expectations, that will be a massively hawkish event … and a negative on stock prices.
Because of that, the “dots” are important, and tomorrow we get the first look at expectations for where the FOMC members think interest rates will be at the end of 2017.
Bottom line: If we see movement higher in the “dots,” that will be a hawkish surprise—regardless of the language of the statement.
Expectations
The market has moved pretty solidly ahead of this meeting, to the point where even if “considerable time” is removed from the statement, we might now see much of a reaction (and it’s very much a coin flip if “considerable time” is even taken out).
So, while I do think the trend in interest rates has shifted and is higher, I think there’s a risk of a “sell the rumor/buy the news” reaction unless we see a material shift higher in the “dots.” Unless Yellen is outrageously dovish in the follow-up press conference, any sort of a rally in bonds would be one to sell into, as again I do believe the trend has changed.
Tom Essaye Discussing The Bond Decline in CNBC Closing Bell 9.15.14
/in Investing/by Customer ServiceClick the link below to see Tom Essaye discussing the decline in bonds with hosts Bill Griffeth and Kelly Evans.
Weekly Economic Cheat-Sheet
/in Investing/by Customer ServiceLast Week
There were just two notable U.S. economic releases last week. Although neither was enough to force a change in the outlook for Fed policy, August retail sales were strong and incrementally viewed as increasing the chances for a hawkish statement change this week. Outside of that, the most important thing that happened last week from a data standpoint was some soft Chinese data renewed some concerns about the pace of growth.
Starting with the U.S., though, the most important number last week was Friday’s retail sales report. The headline met expectations (up +0.6% m/m) but it was a better report than that.
The key indicator of retail sales is the “control” group that excludes car purchases, gasoline purchases, building material purchases and food service. As such it gives the best read on true consumer spending.
The “control” group rose +0.4% in August, but more importantly the July number was revised higher from 0.1% to 0.4%, dismissing the concern that consumer spending had suddenly dropped off during the summer.
Does this number, by itself, mean the Fed will get more “hawkish” this week? No, it doesn’t—but consumer spending was one of the more sluggish sectors of the economy, and incrementally it bolsters the argument for the “hawks” to remove “considerable time” from the statement. So, bottom line, the retail sales report doesn’t mean any expectations of actual Fed policy will change. But for this week’s statement, it was viewed as slightly more “hawkish.” (Silly as it is, these are the things we need to worry about in the age of ZIRP and QE.)
Internationally, European data was almost all second tier last week, although it was better than recent reports. But, nothing last week changed the outlook for Europe (i.e., the continuation of a slow recovery).
There was a lot of Chinese data out last week, though, and generally it was disappointing. CPI and PPI were both below expectations (which is usually seen as a positive). But taken in the context of the soft import numbers two weeks ago, the lower inflation numbers furthered the concern that domestic demand in China is slowing.
Over the weekend, industrial production missed estimates (6.9% yoy vs. (E) 8.7%) while retail sales met. There are some concerns re-emerging about the pace of growth in China, but it’ll take more disappointing data (specifically, a lot more disappointing data) before legitimate concerns about a potential “hard landing” take shape.
China is transforming its economy, and that’s going to produce periods of slower growth. But the Chinese central bank and administration remain committed to around 7%-7.5% annual GDP growth. As long as that’s the case, China shouldn’t be a major macro headwind (although it will weigh on emerging markets, which is a positive for EUM).
This Week
Obviously the FOMC meeting is the highlight this week, and the entire focus seems to be on whether the wording “considerable time” will be removed from the statement released at 2 p.m. Wednesday. Keep in mind, though, this is one of the meetings where we’ll get the Fed forecasts (the “dots”) and the Fed chair press conference.
I’ll preview it in Wednesday’s Report, but the bottom line is “considerable time” is the focus of the meeting. There is a definite fear the Fed will get very, very slightly more hawkish in tone (and given this Fed’s propensity to stay “dovish,” I’m worried the market may be a touch ahead of itself and we could see a “sell the rumor, buy the news” reaction).
Part of the reason the market expects this shift is because of the Chair’s press conference—the FOMC can remove “considerable time” from the statement and then she can refute that the Fed is getting more “hawkish” at the press conference. If they don’t do it here, the next press conference isn’t until December.
Outside of the Fed, we get our first look at September economic data via the Empire State manufacturing survey (this morning) and Philly Fed (Thursday), and in all likelihood they’ll both show that manufacturing activity in their respective regions continues to grow at a good pace. (However, activity in those regions has gotten pretty hot, so don’t be surprised by a dip in the numbers –but on an absolute level, activity should stay brisk.)
The other notable domestic release is the August housing data, with housing starts Thursday. The market will be looking for confirmation that the acceleration in the rebound we saw in the July data is continuing.
Internationally it is a very quiet week in both Europe and Asia. The German ZEW survey (out tomorrow) is probably the highlight. If the survey can surprise to the upside, this could help investor sentiment toward Europe as we approach the implementation of the ECB’s Targeted Long-Term Refinancing Operation (TLTRO) and private-market QE program (which starts in October).
To continue reading today’s report, simply enter your email address on the right hand side of this page and begin your 2 Week Free Trial!