Three Scenarios that Could Result in a Big Bond Rally

/in /by

What Makes Me Wrong on Bonds?

It’s obvious to anyone reading this report over the past several weeks that I’m a big long-bond bear, that I think we’ve seen the “top” in Treasuries, and that a long decline in bond prices and a higher move in bond yields has begun.

I’m also aware that a “dovish” Bernanke this week could cause a short-term unwinding of the “higher-rates” trade and send TBF and TBT lower, while “yield-proxy” sectors like utilities and telecom and REITs rebound.  But, I believe that any such trade would just provide an excellent entry point for the larger trend of higher rates.

But, like any good trader, I’m constantly thinking about what would happen that would make me wrong about the direction in bonds.  Well, I thought about this over the weekend and there are three things that can happen that would make my opinion in bonds incorrect.

1. Scenario One:  Japanese & Emerging-Market Debt Enter a Crisis Phase. The swings we’ve seen in emerging-market debt and the Japanese yen have, so far, been volatile but contained.  But, if that volatility increases—and people begin to worry that emerging markets or Japan might lose the ability to sell debt and fund themselves—it would create a crisis. And in a crisis, money flows into U.S. Treasuries, as they remain the “safest” and most-liquid asset in the world. It would be the exact same thing that happened when Europe was in the depths of its crisis.  European investors bought Treasuries for return “of” capital, not return “on” capital.

2. Scenario Two:  Dis-Inflation Becomes “De-flation.” Fed President James Bullard has been one of the most-vocal of the Fed presidents voicing his concern for the low inflation readings globally.  Low inflation, in an environment of massive liquidity, reflects a lack of demand for money and potential deflation.  So, if the five-year inflation expectations on TIPS (one of the best measures of expected inflation), continue to decline—then the Fed will almost certainly abandon “tapering” and may even consider “more” QE.

3. Scenario Three:  The Economy Sees A Summer Swoon—Again.  I was speaking to a subscriber last week and he presented a counter argument from another analyst that basically said we’re in for years of 1%-2% GDP growth, low equity returns, and low bond returns.  So, not quite the 20+ year deflation of Japan, but not that much better, either.  In that scenario, there would be no Fed tapering and likely steady or more QE. Economic data will be the key to watch for this potential scenario.

I remain a bond bear and I believe I’m right on bonds, but I wanted these scenarios on paper so I can watch for them.  Having too much confidence in this business is as dangerous as having too little.

We Didn’t Need This: Greek Dysfunction Returns!

/in /by

We’ve got to keep an eye on Greece again now that yesterday’s closure of the public broadcasting company by Prime Minister Antonis Samaras has ignited a political crisis. This has significantly increased the chances of a “no-confidence” vote and snap (or, early) elections. (Everyone remember how markets reacted the last time it happened in May of last year?)

The turmoil centers around the closure yesterday of the Greek national broadcasting company, ERT, and the immediate firing of all 2,600 employees.  The decision, as you would expect, made the unions go crazy—there are calls from the broadcasting employees’ union for a strike and there are signs of solidarity from other unions as well.  But, potential strikes aren’t really the concern. (This is Greece after all; they know how to handle a strike.)

The bigger issue here is that Samaras basically closed ERT unilaterally, without really consulting his coalition partners, the PASOK party and Democratic Left.  They have come out and said they are not in support of this and are working on legislation to replace the decision.

Further complicating things is the fact that the closure of ERT is basically being done to comply with Troika demands of 2,000 public sector job cuts by the end of the summer, which are required for the next tranche of bailout cash.  So, anti-European party Syriza is keying off this to generate support.

Again, the danger here is that the Samaras-led government faces a “no-confidence vote” and fails, causing snap elections, which again opens the door to an anti-European group like Syriza gaining control … and then we have a re-igniting of the European crisis.

We’re several steps away from that now, but the situation bears watching. If there is a no-confidence vote and the government fails, expect that to be a macro headwind for risk assets.

 

Why The Plunge In the South African Rand Matters to You

/in /by

Away from the yen, the other focus in the currency markets was on the implosion we’re seeing in emerging market currencies.  The Indian rupee hit another all-time low vs. the dollar. The Brazilian real and South African rand hit four-year lows vs. the dollar, and even strong currencies like the Mexican peso got hit yesterday.

The reason for the weakness is this:  Since the Fed went to 0% interest rates and round after round of QE, investors have moved into higher-yielding emerging-market currencies over the past few years.  Well, now with the Fed potentially “tapering” and interest rates in the U.S. rising, investors are reversing the trade, as they no longer need to take the risk of being in emerging markets, as rates are rising here at home.

SevensReport_6.12_pic2

Emerging market debt has collapsed since May, and the decline is unnerving
equity investors.  This ETF needs to stabilize before we can sound an “all clear” in stocks.

Well, that’s causing the currencies of those emerging-market countries to drop as investors sell their bonds and reconvert those investments back into dollars.  Basically, “doomsayers” are saying the world’s major central banks, led by the Fed, have created a bubble in emerging-market credit, and now it’s popping.

The question I’m sure you’re asking right now is “Why the hell do I care about emerging-market credit?”  Well, you care because as these currencies and bonds plunge, it’s causing losses in the leveraged hedge funds that have put the trade on. That’s causing them to liquidate other holdings to cover the losses (like stocks and gold, for instance).

Point being, you should care for the same reason everyone should have cared when the mortgage-backed security markets started blowing up in ‘07, ‘08 and eventually led to the takedown of Bear, Lehman, etc.  I’m not saying it’s the same thing here at all—but it’s the leverage and the huge declines that are making people nervous.

So, while it’s not a disaster yet, this unwind out of emerging-market debt and currencies is having an effect on all asset classes.  It’s not anywhere near 1998-style proportions yet (the emerging market debt crisis), but it is unnerving investors, and weighing on other risk assets.  Bottom line is watch the PowerShares Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and the iShares JPMorgan USD Emerging Bond Fund (EMB), the two emerging-market bond ETFs. Emerging-market bonds need to stabilize in order for equity markets to calm down a bit.

Bottom Line

Since the Fed “tapering” narrative began 3+ weeks ago, equity markets have basically been at the mercy of other markets (namely currencies and bonds), and that continued Tuesday.

The volatility in those markets is starting to unnerve investors, as watching major currencies and bonds gyrate around like penny stocks is a bit unsettling.

But so far, this is just part of an adjustment process that is to be expected as the market comes to terms with the prospects of higher interest rates going forward. Unless 1,600 is violated on the S&P 500, I don’t think that there’s any reason to materially reduce equity exposure at this point.

Continuing to focus on the clear trend of higher rates remains, in my opinion, a good place to slowly and methodically add exposure.  To that end, I do want to point out one ETF that rallied more than 1% yesterday and seems to be positioned to capitalize off this bond-market turmoil. The ProShares Short High Yield Bond Fund (SJB), the short junk-bond ETF, doesn’t trade with a lot of volume (90K shares yesterday) but it’s about the only way I know of for non-bond investors to get short exposure to the high-yield market, which is seeing a nasty sell-off as emerging-market debt and other high-yielding bonds get hit.

SevensReport_6.12_pic2 (2)

Shorting the high yield market has served as a good hedge against equity volatility,
and should continue to do so as long as currency and emerging market bond volatility weigh on stocks.

SJB is a volatile position and not for everyone. But if you’ve got some risk capital to put somewhere, it’s worth a look, as it should continue to benefit during this “adjustment period” and might serve as a good hedge. (It basically is acting like a short position on the market.)

Interest Rates are Headed Higher. Are You Ready?

/in /by

Over the past several weeks we’ve been witnessing equities go through an “adjustment period” as the reality of Fed “tapering” and ultimately removing QE sets in.  Because this adjustment is an ongoing process, I don’t know if last week was just a typical correction and now it’s time to get “all in” in equities broadly.

But, the clear takeaway from last week was that Fed “tapering” remains very much on schedule, and as a result we should see continued downward pressure on bonds/upward pressure on rates.

I know that successful investing/trading is best achieved by finding clear trends in sectors & corners of the market, so if stocks will continue to “adjust” to the prospects for lower bonds/higher rates, then let everyone else worry about the “broad” market’s near term direction, while we get incrementally more long things that do well in a rising interest rate environment (some names to consider are: TBF, TBT, SJB, financials, equities broadly, and very selectively, hard asset related sectors and stocks).

So, put bluntly, stop worrying about where how to market is going to adjust to higher rates, and instead just get “long” higher rates – that’s the definitive trend in the market right now. 

Economic data remains critical (it’s the one thing that can de-rail the “tapering” narrative), and the FOMC meeting on the 19th is the next major catalyst.  Nothing really important happens domestically this week, though.  So, as long as Japan behaves, I think we’ll see a continued drift higher in broad markets this week.

This Analysis Could Be the Difference Between Outperformance and Underpeformance.

/in /by

“Bad” is Not “Good” Anymore.

Again, all this economic data coming with week is important because the world’s central banks are very, very data-dependent with regard to policy.  As the data goes, so will go markets.  But, and this is important: We are not in a “bad news is good for stocks” environment, especially here in the U.S.  Previously, markets have rallied because bad economic news meant more QE, which had been good for stock prices.  That is no longer true.  The market doesn’t want more stimulus and QE.  (That statement can be made globally, but it’s especially true here in the U.S.)  It is time for the domestic and global economy to turn for the better and for growth to re-engage.  That is the key to sustainably higher equity prices, and that’s why the data is important.

Despite the media reports, one thing that was not the reason for the strength in stocks yesterday was the weak ISM manufacturing PMI.  Again, bad economic news is not good for the market (as it has occasionally been in the past).  More QE isn’t the answer to a sustained rally from here—good economic growth is.  So, bad economic data this week is not good, regardless of the short term market reaction.

That said, the weak economic data yesterday was somewhat dismissed, but that’s mainly because of the looming jobs report Friday, which is far and away the “most important” economic report from a WWFD standpoint (What Will the Fed Do).

Bottom line is nothing much changed yesterday despite continued volatility.  This market remains very resilient and certainly isn’t going to go straight down, and yesterday’s rally is consistent with the choppy trading we’ve seen lately.

To me one of the biggest things that continues to stick out to me is the unwillingness of money managers to at least partially lock in 14% year to date returns on the third day of June, because everyone is so “sure” the market will eventually march higher, and as a result are happy to stay long through any correction.  I continue to think that selectively booking some profits at these levels, while staying broadly long, makes sense from a common sense and contrarian standpoint.